David Shaywitz: And so there are different companies that are sort of trying to work on that. But even if they sort of crack that in general, there are often so many other steps after that that even if, um, you know, the thing was the new novel coronavirus they just really figured it out what it was. It was amazing in the sense that they were able to get the genome sequence relatively soon out, you know, within a month or so of the thing that identifies and it takes a while to go from that. Even that knowledge. Okay, we have the genome that's great about this virus. How do you turn that into actionable information? Now, one company that may be doing this is, um, a company called Madrona, which is trying to make vaccines and they have sort of a proprietary AI platform that only under the DNREC don't really share a lot about that apparently tries to take with aspects of the, of, of a gene where that, uh, the protein encoded by a gene is most likely to be most useful for something like a vaccine. But again, we're not really going to know. It's going to take a while to figure out if this works, even though they're really moving almost unimaginably quickly. I mean, based on some of their work, which in turn was based on previous work because the new virus is similar to the African virus, they are actually expected to start clinical trials in a year. And that's sort of, I mean an imaginably fast for the accident.
Jason Lopez: Because of AI that they're able to move that quickly.
David Shaywitz: You know, it's really hard to tell. I imagine that they would say that they were able to pick out the specific app, which to know what part of the virus to pick out and use for a vaccine was as a consequence of, you know, algorithms and
Jason Lopez: I see, let's actually not call it AI, let's call it just big data, unstructured data, you know, that kind of thing. Right. How long have researchers been using big data and using analysis of unstructured data with computers to do research into genomes and viruses and bacteria? How long have they been actually using it? Or is it still sort of an experimental thing?
David Shaywitz: Right. So if it's sort of two parts of the question, the genomics community has been really having been on this really, really, really early and they've been fairly early adopters of cloud or at least some people have. But what confuses a lot of people about when you think about, uh, you know, large organizations like pharmaceutical companies, in particular, is, on the one hand, they haven't seen or data-driven organizations and they have a lot of data, but big data is sort of almost, it says I'm a little bit of a different meeting. Big data has as much more sort of both comprehensive and it's all sort of um, you know, generally for interlocking, whereas what you sort of wind up having it almost like the Minnesota model of data where it's like the land of a thousand lakes. So there's a little bit of a Lake here of data all over the Lake there and each of these lakes to push the metaphor or zealously guarded by whoever is sort of owned or responsible by that data.
I mean their data that's collected for a very specific purpose and it has intrinsic value in itself. But then the question is, can you sort of pulling it, is there value and how do you pull it together more effectively? And that's really where the industry is. Now. There's a general sense that my gosh, how we're handling data and all of these little silos doesn't make a lot of sense. And when it'd be great if we could, um, kind of pull it, pull this together in some useful way. And I think a lot of companies are struggling, you know, how to do that. And on the one hand, as you know, the idea of what's really exciting for me to see is how things like the cloud, which used to be are something that just made help people in particular really nervous. It was, it was viewed as, Oh no, we want to keep our data, you know, on our local server versus in the cloud somewhere. People finally recognize that in many cases, you know, for, for the kind of the major providers, in particular, the cloud is far more secure than um, uh, having the data in sort of, you know, some personal data room or something. So,
Jason Lopez: Well I imagine all the data that you were saying. You know, it's kind of a people thing here in terms of the 10,000 lakes idea. But imagine if they could actually even get deeper into like flight manifests and actually know where people are. Of course, now you're getting into the privacy issue. Boy, it's very, very complex.
David Shaywitz: It's complicated, right? And I think, I mean I think they do have actually de-identified flight information there and you know, they do try to uh, to understand this. If you look at it for all of this information, I was reading some article recently about how they're trying to track the so-called patient zero. The basic assumption is that there's a new coronavirus that originated from a back somewhere cause I think that's where all these viruses eventually come from. Someone basically eats a bat apparently or a bad infect something that somebody eats and it turns out there aren't any bats near that market. And Wu Han, the Nerf bat is like a relevant bat somehow, like a thousand miles away. So you know, people are, you know, going back and it seems, you know, the market was I guess in December, but they will keep her going back in November and just trying to show you that it's really hard to track the very beginnings of something, you know, in theory where you might've been able to, to stop something.
So it is really a, you know, what you're pointing out is so interesting because in the one that we have an, a population level is an incredibly rich information, but on an individual level, you know, tracking down this very specific type of thing can be really, really hard. And then how do you turn this into something actionable? Like so much of what I read about tech and AI is this could do this or it may do this or might do that. And it's, it's like a combination of this, an urgent need with some promise again of what's going to happen. And I think the technologies are immensely powerful. So I think trying to kind of tone down the rhetoric and really try to come up with some very pragmatic use cases that deliver a palpable benefit that people really can appreciate.
Jason Lopez: I guess one final line of questioning here is one final topic and that is touching on something that you brought up a little earlier, which is what can be learned. I mean the pandemic is on us. What do you think might happen as a result of all of the scrambling people are doing right now to do research and to implement a lot of technologies?
David Shaywitz: Absolutely. Well I think it's a great question. I think it is an opportunity, you know, exposure to stress both exposes the fragility and has a chance to, for the organizations, the people, the processes that can learn from it really helps robust defy them and make some sort of more and more able to deal with uh, adversity. Actually think one area where we're really going to see this, how we're going to be coping with the, you know, all the corn teams that are coming up. The two areas I'm thinking about involving technology, our Telecare and then all of the telecommuting stuff. So, and tele-education.
Jason Lopez: Yeah. You don't really know if something can really work unless you're forced to have to do it.
David Shaywitz: Let me make two points about that. Um, I mean one specifically or the data, but the first point is, you know, it's the famous quote various, they attributed to everyone from Caesar to a Mike Tyson that everybody has a strategy until they get punched in the face. Um, and I think at a certain level that that's true. But the flip of that, Caesar said that, well, something along those lines. Um, but, but then the other thing would people say is that's also so important about data. So what happens is we were talking before about these large data lakes that then might turn out not to be that useful. And so what happens is if you collect all your data with the idea that theoretically curious people could use it to answer anything, it's like theoretical, theoretical, theoretical. And then when people try to use it for practical reasons like, Oh, it doesn't really work that well and that's why what seems to be much more effective is when you try to figure out what is your actual question you're trying to ask and then really ask it and iteratively ask it. Cause as you start to figure out what data you need, the goal is to try to do it as soon as you can as the whole. I mean that's fundamentally how startups work where they try to figure out here this is our working hypothesis, but let's actually try to talk to a customer.
Jason Lopez: Yeah. That reminds me of why the cloud has been so powerful lately for startups because you don't have to put together a bunch of boxes for your data collection and then hire an it team to oversee all that
David Shaywitz: 100% you have to have, you've totally taken that off the table. Essentially everybody can have unlimited, secure, safe computing everywhere, compute and storage everywhere. It's immensely liberating and empowering for startups and that's how come all the startups use it.
Jason Lopez: Yeah. And so if, if you have an idea to do some vaccine research, you don't have to start a data center to go do it. You can just get AWS or wherever you want to go and, and you're up and running.
David Shaywitz: Right? I mean, this is like, you know, when I used to be chief medical officer at DNA nexus, I know it was just so conspicuously obvious there that to the cloud is enormously empowering. And it was funny because even five years ago there were a lot of medical centers are like, Oh, I don't know about the cloud. We're a little bit concerned and now it's actually obvious that that's the safer place to go. There are different approaches to cloud. Obviously, if, you know, sort of failing it, it seems, um, I mean almost sort of, um, it seems so clearly advantageous now that I think that the, you know, the, the discussion has moved onto the next series of challenges.
Jason Lopez: David Shaywitz is a Harvard-trained medical doctor and scientist who co-hosts the podcast on digital health called tectonics. He's also the founder of astounding health tech, which advises biopharma companies engaged in research and development. There are all sorts of resources on the web regarding the Coronavirus. If you want to see a real-time dashboard of the global spread of the pandemic, the center for systems science and engineering of Johns Hopkins university publishes one. It's in the notes accompanying the post of this podcast. This is the tech barometer podcast. I'm Jason Lopez. Check out our other podcasts at www.theforecastbynutanix.com.